[cr0ss]

Hey guys,

this is a stereoscopic 'test', I've done, I've rendered out 3 images, (In Nuke if you must know), with a slight different camera angel and I'm wondering which one is the best one?


Please click to view at full view and through your 3d glasses and tell me which one looks the best, A, B or C?

*hint try covering the other 2 images while looking at an image*



Thank you very much for looking!

[3Dfool]

I would go with "A" but all three exhibit some severe stereoscopic issues. You need to pay attention to your inter-axial distance. You have almost no parallax depth cues on the house. The house as a whole looks flat. Secondly both the house and the foreground trees are in negative (coming of the screen) depth space. This causes the trees to violate the rule of breaking frame. 3D depth should reside behind the screen plane unless you have a FOV larger than your peripheral vision. (like projecting on an IMAX screen) Also for a black and white anaglyph you should boost the levels you loose so much contrast with filters that you need to compensate.

I have attached a revised example that shows the house and trees set back in proper space. The shallow inter-axial spacing on your cameras can be seen in how flat the house appears. Like its on a 2D card.

Thanks for your sharing. Thanks for sharing this useful information. It's great.
eco diagnostic pret taux zero immobilier |
Credit pret a taux zero 0 |
Pret taux zero a 0