Iīve been using Combustion for quite sometime.And a lot of goodies have been added to Combustion derrived from Flame.So how close really are they?I have heard opinions ranging from "Combustion moving ever closer to Flame" to "Combustion is nothing like Flame".One explanation could be the cost difference.Combustion is a desktop compositor while Flame comes with Autodesk Systems.And since I canīt get my hands on Flame can anybody please take some time and answer the following:
The cost difference is due to the hardware you have to purchase with Flame?I canīt imagine any software alone costing 200.000 Dollars.
How much better in features is Flame than Combustion?I imagine Flame is much more powerful as performance but what happens with features?
Everybody advices a move to Fusion for cost reasons.Is Flame all that better than Fusion too?
Ultimately is it wrong to insist on working with Combustion?Will it help me at all if moving to Flame or is it Flame quite a different story?Should I move to Fusion before Flame?
Could you provide sites for Flame training.
Thank you for your time and effort.Any answer is trully going to be appreciated.