Shake CPU test Application for Mac OSX

[Arnqvist]

Render times:

1 CPU thread: 13.85 seconds
2 CPU threads: 7.04 seconds







Mac OSX 10.5.5
Shake v4.10.0606
iMac, 3,06 Ghz Core 2 duo 2GB RAM

[hidefguy]

Render times:

1 CPU thread: 16.19 seconds
2 CPU threads: 8.79 seconds
3 CPU threads: 6.26 seconds
4 CPU threads: 4.73 seconds





Mac OSX 10.4.11
error: NRiScript1.format, line 1: unknown variable Full Full ^ Shake v4.10.0606
mac pro, 2 x 3.0GHz dual core, 4gb ram

(wow, seems slow.... I take that back, just saw Hugh's results.)

[magno]

Render times:

1 CPU thread: 15.15 seconds
2 CPU threads: 7.56 seconds
3 CPU threads: 5.59 seconds
4 CPU threads: 3.95 seconds
5 CPU threads: 3.28 seconds
6 CPU threads: 2.84 seconds
7 CPU threads: 2.46 seconds
8 CPU threads: 2.13 seconds

Mac OSX 10.5.5
Shake 4.10.0606
Mac Pro, 8 x 2.8Ghz, 2G RAM

[Maddler]

Render times:

1 CPU thread: 12.82 seconds
2 CPU threads: 6.61 seconds
3 CPU threads: 4.85 seconds
4 CPU threads: 3.43 seconds
5 CPU threads: 2.87 seconds
6 CPU threads: 2.49 seconds
7 CPU threads: 2.15 seconds
8 CPU threads: 1.87 seconds

Mac OSX 10.5.5
Shake v4.10.0606
Mac Pro, 2 x 3.2GHz Quad Core, 20GB RAM

[ericohman]

20 gb ram??

your 3.2 ghz rendered at 1.87 (8 cores) and so did our (post on first page). nice to see that other have gotten the exact same render time.

we have 3.0 and 3.2 ghz computers but after seeing these tests I doubt the extra .2 ghz was worth the price. it varies from 10 milliseconds to around 20. maybe after a year you may have saved 5 minutes for a couple hundred dollars

[ericohman]

just wanted to say that the link is working again. happy testing!

[stuckfootage]

2011 2.2GHz 15" 4GB RAM MacBook Pro:

1 thread 10.99
2 threads 5.75
3 threads 4.27
4 threads 3.97
5 threads 3.43
6 threads 3.05
7 threads 2.74
8 threads 2.53