Thread: film scanned to proRES...Help

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1 film scanned to proRES...Help 
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    233
    HI all,

    Ok, I have a 5 minute short that was filmed on 35 mil and was transfered (scanned) to a quicktime ProRES 4.2.2
    It was filmed & scanned in Prague/FAMU, from a film student. They gave him 2 choices for the transfer to be in, and he picked Quicktime.(wrong choice I bet)
    He gave me the edited version that he said is an exact duplicate in QT properties.

    Frame Size = 1920 x 1080
    Compressor = Apple ProRes 422 (HQ)
    Quality = Most (5.00)

    From what I understand, film scans are 10bit dpx files. So I don't know if I should treat this as a "Video" 8 bit or a "Film " 10 bit log?

    I am doing color grading on it and from what I hear, 10 bit would give better headroom and better results.
    Did we loose any chance to using it as a 10 bit by using a Quicktime?
    Is there any way to convert it to 10 bit?
    I am so confused....

    Thanks,
    lou
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Now in K-Town, Los Angeles
    Posts
    460
    The ProRes "HQ" codec actually is 10 bit YUV, so depending on what exactly happened to the data between the scanner and the QuickTime files, you should have 10 bit images in there.

    That said, whether it is linear/video/log - there's no way to tell from what you have said. It's also a completely separate issue from how many bits you have. It's perfectly possible for an image to be 10 bit linear, or 8 bit log, etc. (Though, 8 bit log would certainly be uncommon.) You'll have to talk to whoever did the transfer to find out what exactly was done with it as far as color space handling. Does it look like log? If it looks fairly normal, my first guess would be that your ProRes files are going to be in rec.709 color space, but that's purely speculation. (It's sort of the "standard" HDTV color space. If somebody was giving your HD res ProRes QuickTimes, I'd guess they would assume that's what you wanted.)

    As far as converting 8 bit to 10 bit, of course it's possible to convert between the various formats. You just store each pixel with an extra two bits. It doesn't add any real data, though. It's like asking, can I convert the 5 digit number "345.73" into a 7 digit number. Of course you can. It's "345.7300"

    What are you using to do your grading? Perhaps somebody will have used the same system, and they can suggest some specific settings for making sure that it uses the highest quality calculations that it can do.


    Maybe this helps a little bit. If not, keep asking questions.
    I never seem to notice 'visitor' messages until months later. In theory, a PM should email me to let me know I have a message.
    Reply With Quote  

  3. #3  
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    233
    Hi again,
    Thanks so much for the reply

    Well, when I import it, it looks fine, no weird gamma shifts.
    Is there a way to find out for sure what it is for sure?

    Also, I have access to Scratch & Nucoda at work, and I tried it in Scratch.
    I am very confused, when I look at the properties, it said RGB-10 LIN

    But when I look at the properties in Premiere, I get this:
    Type: QuickTime Movie
    File Size: 5.8 GB
    Image Size: 1920 x 1080
    Pixel Depth: 24
    Frame Rate: 23.976

    So my next question is this:
    If it turns out to be a 10 bit QT Linear file, Will I be able to push the colors more than an 8 bit or is it the same sH_t?
    Reply With Quote  

  4. #4  
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Now in K-Town, Los Angeles
    Posts
    460
    The only way to find out what it is for sure is to find out more about exactly how it was made.

    If the scan was done properly, then yes, you should be able to push harder on the 10 bit file than you would be able to if it was 8 bits. It would be even better if you had 444 data instead of 422, but it will probably be fine. What you have is probably not exactly linear, but it's not log, so you can pretend it is linear.

    If it had been me, I would have requested something else from the people scanning it that isn't lossy compressed, but ProRes is pretty well respected so you shouldn't really be able to notice much of a difference.
    I never seem to notice 'visitor' messages until months later. In theory, a PM should email me to let me know I have a message.
    Reply With Quote  

  5. #5  
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    1,608
    Blog Entries
    1
    film scanners don't work in linear. It is most likely rec709 or some type of gamma space. Best to ask the lab which did the transfer.
    Reply With Quote  

  6. #6  
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    26
    As Beaker said, if it wasn't transferred log > ProRes 10bit (if it was 'log' it'd look washed out and flat) it's more than likely video/rec709. If you had shot some test charts you may be able to tell if it was transferred proper 709 or linear but it won't make _too_ much difference if you have a decent colourist.
    Reply With Quote  

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 23rd, 2010, 05:46 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: January 6th, 2010, 06:21 PM
  3. The Chase - Visual Effects Reel - Vancouver Film School
    By blueworks in forum Work in Progress (WiP)
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: December 30th, 2009, 01:13 PM
  4. DFT's New SCANITY Film Scanner
    By fullerkim in forum Your News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 3rd, 2009, 11:44 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 4th, 2008, 04:43 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts