Thread: Best SDD and HDD performance combination for Nuke

Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1 Best SDD and HDD performance combination for Nuke 
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    87
    I need to find the best setup I can for a Nuke machine. As well as a good memory and processor I think the storage is the real bottleneck to work faster.

    So I would like to know wich setup would be faster:

    1. SSD for temp folder and RAID0(3x 7200 hdds) HDD for footage
    2. RAID0(3x 7200 hdds) for temp folder and SSD for footage
    3. Two SSD
    4. Two RAIDs
    5. Another one?

    Thanks.
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    536
    Probably the 2 SSD's... it does of course depend on what SSD's you get. You're looking for fast read/write speeds. (Ie - two Fusion IO's are probably faster than two generic brand SSD's)

    An SSD for your main drive will speed up how fast your operating System reacts...

    having your temp folder set to an SSD will speed up playback (Particularly in the Nuke Framecycler which I have heard can playback in realtime if the disk and RAM are fast enough. - never confirmed that myself.)

    Having an SSD -(or set of SSD's for your footage is probably the best thing though. that's a pretty big bottleneck.

    I can't say that I've run a 2 SSD system before... I've only run a 1xSSD 1x7200rpm system before. In that setup - I placed temp folder and source footage folders on the SSD... and placed render folders on HDD... The big reason we did this was because of the high price point of SSD's at that time. (We wanted lots of storage but couldn't afford the space on SSD's)

    A good raid is nothing to sniff at... I'd be quite happy with one all to myself. Personally I'd go with the highest read/write speed I can get for my money.
    (Just remember that an HDD will slow down when it is fuller... an SSD theoretically won't have the same limitation. (They can also access anywhere on the disk without excess delay, unlike a HDD.... I have no idea how to quantify this speed increase though)
    Process; Compute: Situation = Unacceptable; /// > Compute: Solution ... > Locating File: Understanding.exe... > ERROR: File not found /// > ... ... ... System = Crashing Process; Load: Default File; ... > Locating File: Rage.exe... > File Found /// > Executing
    Reply With Quote  

Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. nuke performance
    By n0b0dy in forum NUKE from The Foundry
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 6th, 2012, 12:32 PM
  2. Increasing Performance in Nuke 6.2v1
    By snowman25 in forum NUKE from The Foundry
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: June 12th, 2011, 05:16 PM
  3. NUKE & PERFORMANCE
    By sulako in forum NUKE from The Foundry
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: March 3rd, 2010, 11:41 AM
  4. Nuke on a Mac Pro - performance and stability
    By nikita in forum NUKE from The Foundry
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: September 17th, 2007, 03:23 PM
  5. Best performance booster for Nuke. Memory or CPU?
    By NEO in forum NUKE from The Foundry
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 24th, 2007, 02:00 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts